Aaron wrote:Just say WASP cause that certainly doesn't have a negative connotation.
I don't mean only WASPs; I was referring to any group in a situation where that group is dominant. When you're talking about sexism, that refers to males. When you're talking about race, in most places, including America, that refers to whites. When you're talking about religion, in the US that refers to Christians.
meg's comment that complaining about WASP discrimination is like complaining of your splinter to someone with broken limbs is pretty accurate. I don't have anything to add onto that.
Aaron wrote:What about positive racism? Wouldn't you agree that is also racist?
BG wrote:Now now! Don't get the Asians rushing in here complaining about being expected to have the latest in technology and people assuming they're really smart and capable.
"Positive racism" is a misnomer, since it typically falls into an overall negative stereotype.
The best one is the "Asians are all smart"/"Asians are good at math" one that B_G mentioned. It fits into the stereotype of Asians as the "model minority": hardworking and (most importantly) uncomplaining. Not coincidentally, that's the same description of an ideal slave. The kind of people who hold that stereotype as absolutely true are the kind of people who find nothing wrong with demanding that you do your homework for them, because they think you "enjoy" it, or the kind of people who shove their work onto you because "the Asian guy won't complain".
When you've actually had personal experience in the matter, it becomes obvious that "positive racism" is still clearly racism. That fact is definitely unclear to either of you. (There's also positive racism about one's
own race, which is rather the textbook definition of racism. I'm assuming you're not referring to that sort.)
Benevolent_Ghaleon wrote:Funny enough, those same people that you hear complaining also support Affirmative Action.
The idea that affirmative action is a form of reverse racism is a basic misunderstanding of what affirmative action
is. I'm not going to get off-topic by exploring this subject more, but the way that AA policies are implemented at most companies is geared at ensuring that discrimination in hiring and promotions doesn't take place (e.g., what sort of questions you can't ask, what sort of factors you can't consider, etc.).
There are some places that do take this to mean that you should imply a quota system (this is very rare, but it does happen--at some colleges for instance. I'd also argue that this is a fundamental misunderstanding of AA, but again, that's another subject). Even in those cases, though, Asians in the US and Canada never benefit from a quota system; Asians represent a higher share in higher education than their percentage in the overall population, so quotas do nothing. KF