phyco126 wrote:
Personally, I believe that he is innocent. Whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty? You retards just believe what everyone else wants you to say. Like the jock in HS that says "Damn this place sucks." Suddenly, you'll have 2,000 other students saying the same damned thing.
No need to call people retards, phyco. It certainly wouldn't help convincing me.
I do agree with you though. It is innocent until proven guilty. It makes me angry, in discussions, when there's an implicit assumption that the person's guilty. Now, if someone considers the evidence and weighs it carefully, I'll listen to what they have to say, though whether I agree depends upon many different things.
As for me, I didn't hear all of the evidence, so I can't make a clear opinion of it. That's why there's a jury that focuses on the case. I believe, if they found a reasonable doubt (which they did, Undine's right), that I cannot call Michael Jackson a pedophile, unless new evidence were to come to light that would overturn the doubt.
I'm not a fan of Michael Jackson... I'm pretty neutral altogether where he's concerned. I think he looks weird, and is perhaps eccentric, but I do not judge him good or bad based on that. Have him be convicted guilty or obviously be so by evidence that I've not heard yet, and I'll reevaluate that stance.